Delivery & Return:Free shipping on all orders over $50
Estimated Delivery:7-15 days international
People:16 people viewing this product right now!
Easy Returns:Enjoy hassle-free returns within 30 days!
Payment:Secure checkout
SKU:46031547
784 ab urbe condita—31 AD. Jerusalem sits uneasily in a Roman Empire that has seen an industrial revolution and now has cable news and flying machines—and rites and morals that are strange and repellent to the native people of Judaea. A charismatic young leader is arrested after a riot in the Temple. He seems to be a man of peace, but among his followers are Zealots and dagger-men sworn to drive the Romans from the Holy Land. As the city sinks into violence, the stage is set for a legal case that will shape millennia—the trial of Yeshua Ben Yusuf. Intricately imagined and ferociously executed, Kingdom of the Wicked is a stunning alternative history and a story for our time.
This is quite an astonishing book. I read a lot of alternative history, and I have to say that this is right up there with the very best. The point of divergences well explained in the appendix. Interestingly the point of divergence, which I will share here, has been discussed in economics blogs, and generally seen as being a reasonable point. In other words there is possibility about this. See here for further discussions : https://medium.com/@MarkKoyama/could-rome-have-had-an-industrial-revolution-4126717370a2 The characters are really well done, even the ones that are historical. There is a plausibility about dialogue, about their actions, and about their inner thoughts. There are some incredibly in magic writing in this, that makes is sit back and think. I have no doubt that the right-wing, the Christian evangelists, these will hate this book with a burning fiery passion. That in itself is a recommendation in my view… but even if you come from a Christian perspective this makes you sit back and think about the nature of people, about the nature of good and evil, and about the way in which we construct our views of the eternal. It takes on some really big questions. When, if ever, is torture allowable? How would you ensure, even if it was, that was effective in the sense of obtaining accurate information? When does somebody go from being a terrorist to being a national hero? How tolerant should we be of other religious or ethical viewpoints? Is chattel slavery worse than economic slavery? What is the nature of gender and sexuality? If colonization brings significant material and economic improvements is a good thing, or is it always bad?This book is the first part of a trilogy, and I for one cannot wait until the next instalment